For of what use to the wiped out is a doctor who is oblivious to the reasons for specific states of the body? Furthermore, of what use is a legislator who can't figure how, why and whence every occasion has begun? The previous will barely probably suggest legitimate treatment for the body while the last option, whenever denied of the expected information, will track down it difficult to manage conditions. Nothing, subsequently, ought to be all the more painstakingly made preparations for and more steadily searched out than the main sources of every occasion, since issues of the best significance frequently start from trifles, and it is the underlying motivations and originations in each matter which are the most effortlessly cured.
complaining that if:history neglects to resolve questions concerning why and how a given occasion occurred, and for what reason, and whether there was anything uncommon about the result, what is left is an award paper without instructive worth, something that gives transient fulfillment, yet is of no assistance by any means for what's to come.
Once in a long while, be that as it may, does Polybius give one, straightforward, superseding clarification as he continued looking for understanding. All things considered, he focuses to various drivers, has a prominent inclination for quietly striated understandings, and vigorously embraces intricacy. For instance: was the Subsequent Punic Conflict the consequence of Carthage's assault on Saguntum, a Spanish city united to Rome, or of its previous intersection of the Ebro? Was it, maybe, the drawn out result of Rome's own prior infringement of a ceasefire when it entrepreneurially — and unlawfully — held onto Sardinia and Corsica while Carthage was riven by the horrendous internal conflict of the Truceless Conflict? Or on the other hand was it basically the unavoidable aftereffect of antiquated abhorrences and Punic revanchism, typified in the legend of Carthaginian general Hamilcar Barca constraining his young child Hannibal to promise vindicate on Rome for his own losses during the Main Punic Conflict? Or then again maybe, and more probable, was it a blend of all the abovementioned, for certain drivers more quickly strong and effective than others?
All through the Chronicles, and particularly in Daedalean international circumstances, for example, these, Polybius will tenaciously present all contentions and clarifications and afterward weigh them together, not really inclining absolutely in one heading, yet endeavoring to continuously introduce the most legitimate contending perspectives. No solid hypotheses or roughly stingy clarifications of structural disturbances in global legislative issues for this carefully prepared student of history cum-legislator. As a matter of fact, some cutting edge, more hedgehog-like scholastics in the field of safety studies might find this approach disappointing and Polybius out and out excessively mentally vulpine for their preferences. Other, all the more generally disapproved, researchers of statecraft will presumably observe Polybius' way to deal with be both the really fulfilling and more intelligent of discretion's vivid quality.